fbpx

Field Notes


New Fracking Fluid Disclosure Requirements Will Benefit Wyoming

By Bruce Pendery, chief legal counsel
Bruce_sharp_web
On January 23, Wyoming’s Seventh Judicial District Court approved a settlement of our lawsuit over the disclosure of chemicals used during hydraulic fracturing. This settlement is another step in the right direction for Wyoming, as it will make it more difficult for companies to receive “trade secret” exemptions from disclosing fracking chemicals to the public.

We engaged in this lawsuit because we believe the public has the right to know which chemicals are being injected underground during fracking.

We credit the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and Halliburton for working cooperatively with us to improve the Commission’s disclosure policies for the benefit of Wyoming citizens. Personally, I’m confident that full transparency will ultimately win out in Wyoming because it’s the right thing to do and it’s in the best interest of both industry and the public.

The Wyoming Outdoor Council, Powder River Basin Resource Council, Earthworks, and the Center for Effective Government jointly brought the lawsuit in 2012 after the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission agreed repeatedly, at the request of industry, not to disclose many of the constituents of fracking fluids to the public.

Wyoming became the first state in the nation in 2010 to require oil and gas companies to disclose the identities of chemicals used during fracking. Under this rule, companies are required to disclose the constituents of fracking fluids to the Oil and Gas Commission, which then, pursuant to the Wyoming Public Records Act, can be reviewed by the public.

However, the Commission had been granting a significant number of requests from industry not to disclose these constituents under claims that they were protected as “trade secrets” or “confidential commercial information.”

Initially, the district court ruled against us in 2013, so we filed an appeal with the Wyoming Supreme Court. And in March 2014, the Supreme Court issued a decision validating our claims and reversing the trial court decision. Among other things, the Supreme Court held that the Wyoming Public Records Act “creates a presumption that denial of inspection is contrary to public policy” and adopted a stringent test for what constitutes trade secrets, one that had been adopted by federal courts.

The court ruled that the exemption from public disclosure for trade secrets is narrow and the public’s right to the information is paramount, with the burden on the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to show that secrecy is justified.

Following lengthy and laborious negotiations over about eight months, the parties were ultimately able to reach a settlement. In addition to the Oil and Gas Commission, there was one industry intervenor involved in the negotiations and settlement, Halliburton Energy Services. Reaching this settlement required all the parties, including the Wyoming Outdoor Council, to work with each other in a cooperative manner that was oriented toward finding solutions, not perpetuating dispute.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, companies seeking a trade secret exemption from fracking fluid constituent disclosure will have to comply with new, much more stringent requirements that we believe should allow the Oil and Gas Commission to more appropriately determine whether a trade secret exemption request is legitimate.

Please get in touch with me (bruce @ wyomingoutdoorcouncil-dot-org) if you would like to know the details of these new requirements.

This settlement will help ensure there is better accountability to the public, and better transparency in general. It will also help ensure that significant public concerns about groundwater contamination due to the use of fracking fluids and potential impacts on public health are fully considered and illuminated. And it will help prevent companies from evading disclosure requirements based on weak claims that the chemicals are so-called trade secrets. All of this is good progress.

Note: Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, involves pumping water, sand, and chemicals at high pressures down oil and gas drill holes so as to fracture rock such as shale and tight sands and release oil and gas. Coupled with its companion technique directional drilling, fracking has been responsible for the large increase in the production of oil and gas in the United States.

You can click here to read the settlement.

Field Notes


How to Curb Wasteful Flaring: Wyoming’s opportunity to protect its citizens and maximize revenue

“Based on an analysis of Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission data, in the 10 months from January to October 2014, almost 4 billion cubic feet of natural gas was flared. That’s enough gas to fuel as many as 11,000 Wyoming homes—the equivalent of nearly every household in Gillette—for an entire year.”

Click here or on the image above to read more!


Click any image below of a gallery of info-graphics from this report:

[envira-gallery id=”8136″]
[envira-gallery slug=”8136″]

Field Notes


Leveling the Playing Field: The Equality State’s Unequal Approach to Air Pollution and How We Can Fix It

“There is an imbalance at work when rules that are known to protect people, our economy, and our environment are available to only a small part of our state’s population. With development coming to some of Wyoming’s most densely populated counties, it only makes sense to learn from our collective experience, and to use that knowledge to get out in front of this new boom.”

Click here or on the image above to read more!

Field Notes


Come work with us! The Wyoming Outdoor Council is hiring a summer intern.

We are pleased to offer a unique summer internship in 2015. The internship is designed to provide a future conservation leader the opportunity to gain a greater understanding of environmental and natural resource issues and protection in Wyoming. The Conservation Intern will also learn about environmental advocacy, and the ways in which the Outdoor Council seeks to effect change and achieve its mission of protecting Wyoming’s environment and quality of life for future generations.

We are accepting proposals for projects that would be relevant to our work and meaningful to the applicant. These research projects could culminate in GIS mapping, a short video documentary, a legal or policy research paper, or other work products. We encourage creativity. Applicants should review the Wyoming Outdoor Council’s scope of work, which can be found on our website.

In addition to this focused work, the Conservation Intern will work alongside multiple staff members who engage in a variety of issues such as oil and gas leasing and development, federal land-use planning, policies for sagebrush ecosystems and sensitive species such as sage-grouse, air and water quality protection, and initiatives to address climate change. The intern will become knowledgeable about substantive environmental issues in Wyoming and will also gain insight into the workings of a nonprofit conservation organization.

Download a PDF of the full job description, or read more here.

 

 

Field Notes


Speak up for air pollution controls in Pinedale next week

You have two great opportunities to speak up for the Upper Green River Basin and support proposed air pollution controls that will help protect people who live and work in the Pinedale area.

Winter Ozone Open House
Tuesday, December 9, 6-8 p.m.
Lovatt Room, Sublette County Library
155 South Tyler Ave., Pinedale, WY

Wyoming Air Quality Advisory Board Meeting
Wednesday, December 10, 9 a.m.
Lovatt Room, Sublette County Library
155 South Tyler Ave., Pinedale, WY

We hope you’ll come out and make sure your voice is heard!

Background and details:

Gaspatch5_CR_web

In recent months, the state has been considering some common sense and generally strong pollution controls for oil and gas development in the Upper Green River Basin.

These proposed measures, if approved, would unquestionably reduce dangerous air pollution from what are known as “existing sources”–the pumps, compressors, and other oil and gas equipment that is already in place and in operation around Pinedale.

Wyoming Outdoor Council members know that we’ve worked long and hard, along with many others, to get the word out about this area’s dangerous ozone pollution. And that we’ve also helped provide the state with a broad range of important technical and practical input–advocating key pollution controls, such as “leak detection and repair,” that will help protect the public health.

It has been an important effort, and one that we’re proud of. While we won’t get everything we’ve asked for, if the draft rule is adopted, we’ll have gotten a lot.

This proposed approach of “leak detection and repair” has proven especially effective in other places when it comes to controlling the emissions that can cause serious air pollution problems including ground-level ozone. It also helps to significantly reduce the level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, especially natural gas. And, of course, fixing leaks captures a marketable, taxable product that would otherwise be wasted. These are reasonable, cost-effective measures.

While the rule can still be improved, it’s also important for the health and quality of life of the communities in the Upper Green that the proposed pollution controls be adopted as soon as possible.

What can you do?

Help us convince the Air Quality Advisory Board that it should recommend these proposed pollution controls to the Wyoming Environmental Quality Council. Once we achieve that, improvements can still be made, but more importantly the new rule can be implemented as quickly as possible.

Here are two changes to the proposal that we are recommending:

  • Expand requirements for leak detection and repair to all emission sources, including pneumatic controllers and pumps.
  • Change the threshold for leak detection and repair from facilities emitting four tons of volatile organic compounds per year to two tons. This would require a great many more existing polluters to reduce emissions and it would thus result in a significant reduction in the amount of harmful pollutants emitted into the air we breathe.

We hope you’ll be able to attend one of the above meetings and ask the Air Quality Advisory Board to send this proposed new rule to the Environmental Quality Council for approval. That way the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality can begin implementing these important changes as quickly as possible. Please be sure to let us know if you have any questions!

Field Notes


Guest Column: New study helps identify greenhouse gas pollution sites

Note: This guest column by EDF’s Jon Goldstein provides an overview of the EPA’s newly developed approach to methane leak detection, as well as some recommendations as Wyoming considers new rules to reduce harmful ozone pollution.

What We Can’t See Can Hurt Us: New Study Provides Insights to Find, Fix Oil and Gas Pollution

By , EDF | Bio | Published: Nov. 24, 2014

image001How do you detect a colorless, odorless gas? It’s an important question especially when that invisible gas is as damaging as what comprises oil and gas pollution. We are talking about hazardous air pollutants (benzene), ozone precursors (volatile organic compounds), and greenhouse gases like methane – a gas that is more than 80 times more damaging than carbon dioxide to the climate in the short term.

Widely available tools like infrared cameras and hand-held hydrocarbon detectors are very effective at detecting leaks from oil and gas equipment, but new technologies and new science are always welcome.

That’s what makes a new paper in the journal Environmental Science and Technology exciting. Led by experts from EPA’s Office of Research and Development, and co-authored by EDF’s David Lyon, this study uses a new technique to identify and measure methane emissions at oil and gas facilities.

A new approach

The EPA-developed approach (known to scientists as Draft Other Test Method 33A) locates sites with methane emissions using mobile, downwind measurements and estimates the size of these leaks using dispersion modeling. Vehicle-mounted devices and mobile methods like the technologies used in this study are a fast-emerging and exciting new tool in the battle to find and fix wasteful methane leaks.

In addition to helping prove up a helpful new draft method, the data collected in the study is also important as air regulators in Wyoming, and elsewhere, look for ways to reduce oil and gas pollution. The report includes measurements from 210 production sites in the Barnett Shale region of Texas, Colorado’s Denver-Julesburg Basin, and the Upper Green River Basin gas fields surrounding Pinedale, Wyoming from 2010 to 2013. A statistical analysis of this data shows two very interesting results:

  1. Only less than 10% of the variation in emission rates could be explained by production levels, which suggests unpredictable events, such as malfunctions and maintenance, have a strong influence on emission rates.
  2. Low production wells can emit a greater portion of their gas production, which may be due to more maintenance issues at older, lower producing sites. 

What does this mean?

In the Wyoming context, it means the state is smart to be addressing older–potentially leakier–existing sources of emissions in its ongoing UGRB rulemaking, and that inspecting as many of these emissions sources as regularly as possible will help reduce air pollution. Mistakes (like malfunctions or forgetting to close a tank hatch) happen, but regular leak detection inspections will help catch as many of these as possible.

Frequent inspections at a broad array of sources is exactly what EDF has been advocating as Wyoming considers new rules in the UGRB to reduce harmful ozone pollution. This approach is consistent with recent regulatory efforts in Colorado and Ohio and is proven to be effective. Other states should take note if they too want to improve oil and gas air pollution, reduce waste, and provide better outcomes for communities who live near oil and gas fields.