fbpx

Field Notes


Dispatch from the inauguration of Governor Matt Mead

By Laurie Milford

Twenty-six new governors are being inaugurated across the nation this week. One of those, Matt Mead, took the oath of office on Monday in Cheyenne.

As an organization whose work includes being an advocate for Wyoming’s natural resources at the state level, the Outdoor Council appreciated the chance to welcome the new governor and First Lady Carol Mead and to tell them we look forward to the work ahead.

After the ceremony began, the Mead children led us in the pledge of allegiance. The audience stood to acknowledge outgoing Governor Dave Freudenthal.

Thaddeus and Christopher Brown sang the “Battle Hymn of the Republic” (Notably, the Brown brothers sang, “Let us live to make men free” instead of the original lyric, which Julia Ward Howe wrote in 1861: “Let us die to make men free.”).

Chief Justice Marilyn Kite administered the oath of office to the elected officials. Governor Mead took the oath last and then made his inaugural address.

As a conservative in the way the word “conservation” connotes conservatism, he warned us that as a state we must live within our means, without “overgrazing our grandchildren’s pastures.”

He cited clean water, clean air, “wildlife that enthralls us all,” and open spaces as resources that deserve our attention. He noted the chance we have in Wyoming to watch the sun set over the “ramparts of the Wind River Range.” He encouraged us to plan for the “water needs of the future.”

I was encouraged by these signals that conservation should be an important tenant in the new administration. Governor Mead also promised to leave the door to his office open, which implied to me that transparency also may be an important tenant in his office.

The highlight of the day was the chance to talk with fellow Wyomingites: I met people from Cody, Thermopolis, and Gillette, and elsewhere. We lined the capitol steps to shake hands with the new governor. Perhaps more than 1,000 of us waited for three hours in the bitter southeastern Wyoming wind for the chance to be received in the capitol rotunda by the five elected officials and their families.

Governor Mead pledged to serve all of us; Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. I look forward with optimism to working with this new administration.

Field Notes


We need to ‘hammer out a better deal’

Freudenthal gives tepid support to Wyoming Range drilling lease retirement proposal

Calls it a ‘good first step’

By The Associated Press | Published in the Casper Star-Tribune, December 16, 2010

CHEYENNE — A proposal to retire drilling leases is a “good first step” in discussions about possible gas drilling in the Wyoming Range, Gov. Dave Freudenthal said Wednesday.

Houston-based Plains Exploration and Production proposes to drill 136 gas wells from 17 pads a few miles south of Bondurant. Last week, the Wyoming Outfitters and Guides Association and the group Wyoming Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife announced a proposed agreement under which PXP would agree to retire about 28,000 of its 64,000 lease acres in the range.

The area is sensitive because it was covered by the Wyoming Range Legacy Act signed by President Barack Obama last year. The act put 1.2 million acres of the Wyoming Range off-limits to new leasing while allowing companies to retain the right to drill on existing leases…

[Read the full story here .]

A member of Citizens for the Wyoming Range suggested the idea could be built upon. The group played an important role in putting most of the scenic mountain range in western Wyoming off-limits to new drilling but wasn’t involved in the proposed agreement announced by the sportsmen groups.

Dave Willoughby wrote an opinion-editorial calling on Bridger-Teton National Forest to “hammer out a better deal” with a wider group of people. “It’s worth remembering that this is our forest. It doesn’t belong to Texas oil companies and it doesn’t belong to people in Washington, D.C. We were not invited when a deal was drawn up at some boardroom table in Houston to drill up our forest,” he wrote. “Sidestepping regular Wyoming people in a deal like this isn’t right.”

Like Freudenthal, Willoughby called the lease retirement proposal a good first step — one that could be built upon and improved.

[Read the full story here .]

Photo by Scott Copeland

Field Notes


‘Heartbreaking’ proposal would be a Jonah Field in the Woods: citizens’ group

A group of local hunters and outdoors enthusiasts, called Citizens for the Wyoming Range, says a recently released proposal to develop an oil and gas field in the Bridger-Teton National Forest’s Wyoming Range would be a “Jonah Field in the woods.”

The group says the development proposal, for a locally treasured hunting area, is “heartbreaking,” and would like to see the company negotiate a lease buyout.

Learn more about this issue and about Citizens for the Wyoming Range here.

Field Notes


‘This Is Our Forest’

By Lisa McGee

DON’T MISS THIS EXCELLENT VIDEO created by High Country News called “This Is Our Forest.”

The video accompanies an important story written by Emilene Ostlind about a proposal to develop a 136-well oil and gas field in the Upper Hoback Basin of the Wyoming Range in the Bridger-Teton National Forest.

The video features local hunters and provides a beautiful sense of what makes this area so special to local families—and why development would be a travesty for the Basin.

The Wyoming Range Legacy Act, which was signed into law in 2009, prevents future oil and gas leasing on 1.2 million acres of the Bridger-Teton National Forest. It does not, however, protect the forest from proposals to develop the 77,000 acres of oil and gas leases in the range that were issued prior to passage of the legislation.

The current 136-well proposal implicates some of these existing leases, which are owned by Plains Exploration & Production Company, or PXP.

For more information and to join the grassroots effort to protect the Upper Hoback Basin, please visit the Citizens for the Wyoming Range website.

Together we can work for a solution that benefits both residents and PXP.

As I’ve noted in previous blogs, the Legacy Act envisions and would facilitate this best-case scenario. Companies like PXP can sell or donate existing leases—and because these leases fall within the boundary of the Legacy Act, they would be retired, and never leased again.

This is a solution that respects the financial interests of the company and would protect the backcountry and wildlife character of the forest that so many of us value.

This type of business decision is not without precedent. At the urging of citizens, legislation similar to the Wyoming Range Legacy Act was also passed for the Lewis and Clark National Forest in Montana.

Several companies that held valid, existing oil and gas leases agreed to sell and retire their leases, while other companies donated leases outright. Other leases have recently been retired outside of Glacier National Park.

We believe these examples from Montana can serve as a model for the Bridger-Teton.

For more information, feel free to contact me at lisa@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org or visit the Citizens for the Wyoming Range website: www.wyomingrange.org.

Field Notes


Celebrate the season with the Wyoming Outdoor Council

By Jamie Wolf

YOU’RE INVITED TO JOIN MEMBERS AND FRIENDS of the Wyoming Outdoor Council in Lander as we celebrate our achievements and discuss the bright future of Wyoming’s oldest conservation organization at our annual holiday party.

Who: Everyone’s invited! Please consider bringing a non-member guest to help our influence grow.

What: Cocktails and hors d’oeuvres with friends, casual dress

When: 6 – 9 p.m., Friday, December 3

Where: Lander Art Center
244 Main Street
Lander, WY 82520

We hope to see you there!

Please contact Jamie Wolf, Outreach Coordinator, to RSVP or for more information.
(307) 721-7610, jamie@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org

Field Notes


WyoFile Feature: WATER FOR OIL


WATER FOR OIL: Wyoming farmers earn cash diverting irrigation water to oil rigs

by Dustin Bleizeffer on November 30, 2010

Reproduced by permission from WyoFile. Click here for the original publication.

Oil for Water

BURNS – Kenneth King climbed into his Ford pickup and slowly drove through a muddy alfalfa field as his dog Molly easily kept pace. He pointed to a spot in the field to the right and said, “What I’m hoping to do here is – see I’ve got this low spot here?”

King hit the brakes and pointed in another direction. “And that’s my irrigation well? And I’m hoping to just pump water that will run into the pond and let trucks come in and suck it out.”

Ranching and farming in the far southeast of Wyoming is an unassuming affair, completely dependent on the sparse amount of rainfall in the region and whatever volume of water an electric pump can coax from the shallow aquifers below.

Three “Groundwater Control Areas” have been in place here for many years, established by the state due to rapidly declining groundwater levels. Irrigators reflexively object when anyone proposes drilling a new water well in the region because most everyone agrees that freshwater aquifers here are over–appropriated.

Yet instead of using the family’s adjudicated water right to irrigate his fields nine miles north of Burns next year, King plans to sell a good portion of the water to oil companies.

“Last summer I didn’t irrigate. So I’m willing to quit irrigating again for this next year or two and sell as much water as I can,” said King.

SHIFTING RESOURCES

Electric utility rates are on the rise, narrowing the profit margin for crop irrigation. King figures he can make a heck of a lot more money by selling water for 35 cents per barrel – at least for a few years while the oil industry drills exploratory wells into the Niobrara oil formation, which many people expect to be the source of major new oil production in Wyoming. Thirty-five cents per barrel is 10-times what King might earn off his water when he uses it for irrigation.

Burns area farmer and rancher Kenneth King hopes to divert a portion of his adjudicated water normally used for irrigation for sale to drillers in the oil industry. Photo: Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile (click to enlarge)

King said it would be nice to earn some extra money to pay off debt and buy a new truck. And King isn’t the only one hoping to cut back on crop irrigation to make money in the oil industry.

Dozens of irrigators in southeast Wyoming are vying to sell their water to oil drillers. In recent months, the Wyoming State Engineer’s Office has approved 40 “temporary water use agreements,” which are required to divert irrigation water to another use. More than a dozen applications still await approval.

“I heard one guy in Goshen County is making $1,600 a week selling his water,” King said.

But others in the region worry about what might happen if Niobrara oil drillers are successful. The industry and dozens of irrigators may become dependent on the business arrangement for five or 10 years of drilling, shifting a declining water resource away from agriculture to an industrial use.

“It would help our nation if we didn’t have to buy all that oil from other nations. … But I’m very concerned about our food supply,” said Laramie County commissioner Diane Humphrey.

Demands on land and water continually increase. As a landowner, Humphrey said she understands the need to earn a living off those basic resources. Even if it’s unconventional.

“Farmers in this country are dedicated to producing enough food for the world. But a lot of times we find other ways to use (land and water),” Humphrey said.

EXPLORATORY OIL RUSH

Last year EOG Resources Inc. drilled a new well into the Niobrara formation using horizontal drilling and multiple–zone hydraulic fracturing techniques. That well, just across the border in Colorado was a gusher, flowing 50,000 barrels of oil during the first 90 days.

The success of the Colorado well, known as the “Jake” well, meant that the industry’s highly–refined horizontal drilling and completion technologies are likely to unlock oil in other areas of the vast Niobrara formation, oil that had earlier been considered impossible to produce economically. The “chalk” formation underlies the Denver–Julesburg Basin – or DJ Basin – spanning much of southeast Wyoming and large areas of Nebraska and Colorado.

Now there’s a rush on exploratory drilling from Greeley, Colo., to north of Wheatland. Drilling is most concentrated in Laramie County. Of the 223 horizontal well applications approved in southeast Wyoming in recent months, 96 are in Laramie County, according to the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.

The Niobrara formation is nearly two miles below the surface in southeast Wyoming. Once the vertical portion of a well reaches the formation, drillers angle the bit and drill horizontally for another 1–1.5 miles through the formation.

WATER FOR OIL

It takes a good deal of water to drill a Niobrara oil well. Water is required to make the drilling fluid, or mud, that controls downhole pressure, and it is used to flush cuttings to the surface.

But the biggest consumptive use of water in the process is hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.” In this process a mixture of water, sand and some chemicals is pumped into the wellbore under high pressure to crack open the oil–bearing shale or chalk and stimulate the flow of hydrocarbons. Each horizontal Niobrara oil well may consist of 15–20 – possibly more – separate “frack” zones.

Much of the information about these horizontal Niobrara wells is held confidential for the first six months or so, as allowed under rules by the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. So nobody is sure yet just how much water it takes to drill and hydraulically fracture a Niobrara oil well. But if it compares to shale gas wells in the Marcellus play in Pennsylvania, it could take about 500,000 gallons of water to drill and 4.5 million gallons to hydraulically fracture each well, according to Chesapeake Energy, a company with large interests in both the Marcellus and Niobrara plays.

BARRELS AND DOLLARS

Five million gallons of water would fill 119,047 barrels. It equals about 11.5 acre–feet of water. If an irrigator were to sell that much water next year at 35 cents per barrel, he’d get $41,666 dollars.

John Barnes, surface water administrator for the Wyoming State Engineer, offered this back–of–the–envelope calculation. If a farmer can raise 5 tons of alfalfa per acre and get $70 per ton, then he’d gross $350 for an acre–foot of water, minus a lot of overhead costs and physical labor.

If the farmer can sell water to oil drillers at 42 cents per barrel, he can make $3,250 for that same acre-foot of water.

“These guys are astute businessmen,” said Barnes. “(Agriculture) is a marginal operation. So if (farmers) can do this for a couple of years, that may allow them to pay down their debt, or this may be the money they need to retire on.”

Barnes said he and his staff have heard, unofficially, that the average Niobrara oil well could require 4 million gallons of water total for drilling and fracking. But even if it is closer to the 5 million gallons required for a Marcellus well, how much water is that? Chesapeake Energy compares it to the amount of water New York City consumes in seven minutes, and how much water a 1,000 megawatt coal-fired power plant consumes in 12 hours.

Five million gallons is about half the volume of water the city of Gillette consumes on an average day.

ZERO–SUM

A loaded water tanker exits a ranch on Campstool Road in Laramie County. Oil companies drilling exploratory wells in the Niobrara formation require millions of gallons of water to drill and complete each well. Photo: Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile (click to enlarge)

For decades, farmers and communities in the Great Plains region have drawn heavily from the shallow Ogallala – or High Plains – aquifer. In most areas, demand for water from the Ogallala outpaces the natural repletion rate, which means the water table drops. Some hydrologists estimate that continually increasing demand for Ogallala water could dry up the aquifer in two or three decades.

Most all irrigation operations in Laramie County that tap into groundwater tap into the Ogallala aquifer. But there are other shallow groundwater formations in greater southeast Wyoming with even more serious water depletion rates. In recent years, the Wyoming State Engineer’s Office has measured alarming drops in groundwater throughout the southeast corner of the state.

One monitoring well southeast of Carpenter has recorded a 37 foot drop in the water table over the past 35 years. Another monitoring well in Laramie County has measured an annual drop of 9 inches since 1978. Some irrigators complain they can’t even pump their appropriated volume of water. Their pumps are sucking air long before irrigation season is over.

The Wyoming State Engineer’s Office insists that taking water normally used for irrigation and diverting it to oil drillers must be a zero-sum game. If a landowner’s annual appropriation is 20 acre feet and he sells 15 acre feet to oil drillers, he only has 5 acre feet left for irrigation that year.

Diverting irrigation water to sell to drillers requires a “temporary water use agreement” from the State Engineer’ Office. Barnes said that the 40 temporary water use agreements approved in recent months total 4,600 acre feet of appropriated water.

Barnes has another back-of-envelope calculation based on early estimations of the Niobrara oil play. He said if the industry moves into full–field development of 12,000 wells, at 4 million gallons of water per well the industry would require 15,000 to 20,000 acre feet of water over the life of the drilling phase, which could last 5-10 years or more.

He said there’s more than enough appropriated water in southeast Wyoming to meet that need.

Still, the use of that much water and the potential drawdown concerns irrigators – even those willing to suspend their irrigation operations for a couple of years. King and several others formally objected when another rancher in the Burns area applied for a permit to drill a new water well.

“If you have an adjudicated water right you can irrigate with it, or if you want to give up irrigation you can sell it,” said King.

But a new water well? “That would be a new straw in the aquifer,” said King.

Despite the state’s insistence that the diversion of irrigation water for oil drilling is a zero–sum game, some ranchers and farmers worry it won’t work out that way.

Laramie County rancher Trevor Witt said he believes that if the drilling industry is buying, an irrigator may actually sell more than he would have pulled from the aquifer during a normal or wet year.

It’s a concern shared by Wyoming State Engineer Pat Tyrrell. In a November 1 policy memorandum to his groundwater and surface water administrators, Tyrrell said the office has received temporary water use agreement applications that “purport to make use of a water right for a well that has scant or no recent historic use under its permit.”

Tyrrell notified staff that temporary water use agreements – particularly in the groundwater control areas – will only be considered for water used in irrigation activity that has been documented for the past five years. To do that, staff members ask to review utility bills and metering information.

Approval of an agreement also requires that each irrigation well be equipped with a flow meter to report water production, and equipped with back–flow prevention devices.

The diversion of water from irrigation to drilling is also a concern for ranchers like Witt who don’t have adjudicated water rights. When his neighbors go from irrigation to dryland farming that means their farms will likely yield only one cutting annually compared to two or three cuttings. And that means the local supply of hay may decrease.

Witt said he usually buys supplemental hay from nearby ranches as he needs it. But if that’s not available, he may have to drive to Fort Collins, Colo., to buy large loads of hay at auction.

“That hits your bottom line,” said Witt.

This is the first of a two-part report examining the oil and gas industry’s use of water resources in Wyoming. On December 7, WyoFile reports on emerging solutions for natural gas producers who also produce a lot water, and must either dispose of it or find beneficial uses for the resource.

Reproduced by permission from WyoFile. Click here for the original publication.

Field Notes


Secretary Salazar to host a forum on hydraulic fracturing



NEWS RELEASE FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR:




ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2010 Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar will host a forum entitled Natural Gas Hydraulic Fracturing on Public Lands: A Forum Hosted by the Department of the Interior.

As recently as November 3, 2010, President Barack Obama reiterated his commitment to the development of natural gas resources. The Department of the Interior shares that commitment and wants to ensure that natural gas is developed in a safe and environmentally sustainable manner so that the United States can fully realize the economic, security, and environmental benefits of this important energy resource.

All credentialed media are invited to cover the event. The forum is open to the public, but space is limited.

Please RSVP to doi_events@ios.doi.gov. The forum also will be streamed live via a link on the department’s homepage at www.doi.gov.

WHO: Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, David J. Hayes, Deputy Secretary of Interior
Carol Browner, Assistant to the President for Energy & Climate Change
Marcilynn Burke, Deputy Director, BLM

Panel 1: Current practice of hydraulic fracturing on BLM land and its potential impacts, moderated by Steve Black, Counselor to Secretary Ken Salazar

Fred Toney, Vice President for U.S. Pressure Pumping, Baker Hughes
Sherri Stuewer, Vice President, Environmental Policy & Planning, Exxon Mobil
Jim Kleckner, Vice President, Operations, Anadarko
Peter Lehner, Executive Director, Natural Resources Defense Council
Steve Moyer, Vice President, Government Affairs, Trout Unlimited

Panel 2: Regulatory considerations associated with hydraulic fracturing on BLM land, moderated by David J. Hayes, Deputy Secretary
Steve Salzman, Division Chief, Fluid Minerals, BLM

Douglas Duncan, Associate Coordinator, Energy Resources Program, USGS
Tom Doll, Supervisor, Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
Mark Fesmire, Director, New Mexico Oil Conservation District

WHAT: Forum on Natural Gas Hydraulic Fracturing on Public Lands

WHEN: Tuesday, November 30, 2010; 1:00 p.m. EST

WHERE: Department of the Interior

South Interior Building Auditorium
1951 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20240

PUBLIC: The forum is open to the public, but space is limited. Please RSVP to doi_events@ios.doi.gov.

MEDIA: All credentialed media are invited to cover the event.

ONLINE: The forum also will be streamed live via www.doi.gov.

Date: November 29, 2010
Contact: Kendra Barkoff (DOI) 202-208-6416

The original media release can be found here.


Field Notes


Pittsburgh Bans Natural Gas Drilling: City Council Gets Standing Ovation

by Marie C. Baca ProPublica

Citing health and environmental concerns, the Pittsburgh, Pa., city council voted unanimously Tuesday to ban natural gas drilling within the city limits. It is the first such ban in a Pennsylvania city.

The 9-0 vote received a standing ovation, according to the Associated Press. Pittsburgh sits on the Marcellus Shale, the gas-rich rock formation that has triggered a drilling boom in the eastern United States. The drillers use a technique known as hydraulic fracturing or fracking, which shoots fluids underground at high pressures to release gas from bedrock. ProPublica has written more than 70 articles documenting the hidden costs of fracking.

The Pittsburgh bill was drafted by the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, a nonprofit advocacy group.

“Commercial extraction of natural gas in the urban environment of Pittsburgh poses significant threat to the health, safety and welfare of residents and neighborhoods within the city,” the ordinance said. “[Drilling] allows the deposition of toxins into the air, soil, water, environment and the bodies of residents.”

Mayor Luke Ravenstahl, who has indicated he opposes the measure, has 10 days to review it before the ban goes into effect. If he vetoes the bill, six council votes would be needed to override him.

Yesterday, the city council in the Pittsburgh suburb of South Fayette passed a zoning ordinance that banned drilling in residential and conservation areas.

See original story on ProPublica here.

Field Notes


136 new gas wells coming to the Bridger-Teton National Forest



Can we do anything about it?

By Lisa McGee

MANY PEOPLE ASSUME THE WYOMING RANGE in the Bridger-Teton National Forest is protected by law. That this locally and nationally cherished mountain range is one place where we don’t have to worry about oil and gas development.

This is unfortunately not the case—as demonstrated by a proposal to develop an entirely new 136-well oil and gas field in the Upper Hoback Basin—a scenic part of the national forest prized for its hunting and recreational opportunities.

The Wyoming Range Legacy Act was a tremendous accomplishment. Signed into law in 2009, it prevents future oil and gas leasing on 1.2 million acres of the Bridger-Teton National Forest. It does not, however, protect the forest from proposals to develop the 77,000 acres of oil and gas leases in the range that were issued prior to passage of the legislation.

The current 136-well development proposal implicates some of these existing leases, owned by Plains Exploration & Production Company, or PXP.

CAN THIS PROJECT BE STOPPED?

If a company holds valid oil and gas leases and is intent to drill, as PXP seems to be, stopping a project is difficult.

Unless a drilling proposal will violate other laws or regulations, it is usually not a matter of whether a proposal will move forward, but how it will and under what conditions.

It’s important to remember, however, that an oil and gas lease is not a property right and drilling on sensitive national forest land is subject to numerous restrictions.

The U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management have tremendous authority to set limits and conditions on a drilling proposal after a lease has been issued.

The Forest Service has said it will release a draft environmental analysis of PXP’s drilling proposal later this month. The results of the analysis will help the public determine whether the project may move forward legally.

The Wyoming Outdoor Council will be advocating that short of prohibiting the project altogether, the Forest Service can and should set strict conditions on the project to protect wildlife, recreational uses, air, and water.

In addition to the company’s proposal, the Forest Service will consider other alternatives, one of which we believe will be a “buy-out” alternative. In this alternative, PXP would agree to voluntarily negotiate the sale, trade, or donation of its existing leases.

The Legacy Act envisions and would facilitate this best-case scenario. Companies like PXP can sell or donate existing leases—and because these leases fall within the boundary of the Legacy Act, they would be retired, and never leased again. This is a solution that respects the financial interests of the company and would protect the backcountry and wildlife character of the forest that so many of us value.

This type of business decision is not without precedent. At the urging of citizens, legislation similar to the Wyoming Range Legacy Act was also passed for the Lewis and Clark National Forest in Montana.

Several companies that held valid, existing oil and gas leases agreed to sell and retire their leases, while other companies donated leases outright. Other leases have recently been retired outside of Glacier National Park.

We believe these examples from Montana can serve as a model for the Bridger-Teton.

LEARN MORE ABOUT THESE SUCCESS STORIES AND HOW WE MIGHT SAFEGUARD THE FOREST ON NOVEMBER 29:

Please save the date and join Citizens for the Wyoming Range in Jackson on November 29th where Gloria Flora, former forest supervisor on the Lewis and Clark National Forest, will share these success stories. Along with Dan Smitherman, a Bondurant outfitter and leader of Citizens for the Wyoming Range, Flora will lead a discussion about PXP’s drilling proposal and ways we can attempt to safeguard the Upper Hoback.

We will let you know when the draft EIS is released, which could be this month. There will be a 90-day comment period and we hope you will weigh in with your continued support for the Wyoming Range.

For more information, feel free to contact me at lisa@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org or visit the Citizens for the Wyoming Range website: www.wyomingrange.org.





MORE INFORMATION ON THE BRIDGER-TETON DRILLING PROPOSAL

About seven miles south of Bondurant, WY, the Upper Hoback Basin is a remote pocket.

Stands of aspen punctuate the basin’s mostly open, rolling terrain. Largely free of roads, elk and other big game animals abound.

Hunters from western Wyoming know this best, coming back each fall to set up camp. Our state’s biologists have identified the basin as one of the most crucial habitats in the state for moose. And the very same mule deer herd that winters on the Pinedale Anticline (the herd that has been carefully monitored due to its record population decline) spends the rest of the year moving through and stopping over in the Upper Hoback.

For wildlife watchers and anglers, the area supports the rare and threatened Canada lynx and numerous other sensitive species, and is home to the headwaters of the Hoback River, parts of which are now congressionally designated “wild and scenic” and support native trout.

The Forest Service manages most of this area for its backcountry character and wildlife values. Given its outstanding values, it is no surprise that the Upper Hoback was included in the protected boundary of the Wyoming Range Legacy Act.

From the perspective of someone who values these qualities, the Upper Hoback is a terrible place for an industrial gas field. Unfortunately, existing oil and gas leases in this part of the national forest date back to the mid-1990s, and a company called PXP or Plains Exploration & Production, now owns most of these leases. Because these oil and gas leases pre-date the Legacy Act, they remain valid.

PXP has proposed drilling 136 wells from 17 well pads—a project it claims will require constructing or upgrading a network of 30 miles of roads.

The noise and disturbance from truck traffic, compressor stations and drill rigs will replace the quiet solitude you can still experience in the Upper Hoback and the project threatens to destroy the integrity of the basin’s wildlife habitat. The Wyoming Outdoor Council and its partners, including Citizens for the Wyoming Range, are working hard to prevent this project from happening.